8.08.2009
korea!
Also, it's been almost impossible to not eat meat since almost every meal consists of a meat dish. we are eating way too well here.
follow us here:
two weeks in our mothers' land
6.23.2009
oops.

6.16.2009
more on China
VIEWPOINT
William Bleisch
China's rapid economic expansion in recent years has been matched by its increasingly voracious appetite for energy and natural resources, says William Bleisch. But, as he explains in this week's Green Room, the nation has sometimes been unfairly portrayed as the world's biggest environmental villain.
As early as 1995, Lester Brown, one of the world's leading environmentalists, predicted that China's increasing demand for food and other commodities would soon drive world prices to record highs.
If the figures were alarming then, they have only grown more so as China's prosperity has increased its global reach and purchasing power.
Cries of alarm have come from more and more people, as China's demand for everything from oil to hardwood timber has been blamed for global price rises.
The increasing affluence of Chinese consumers and their new-found ability to travel the world means that far more of them have the opportunity and the means to purchase tiger skins, ivory and rhinoceros horn.
And as the nation's energy and mining industries have ventured beyond the nation's borders, they have turned out to be every bit as rapacious and unethical as western companies can be; perhaps more so, since they do not have to answer to an open press and domestic outrage.
Growing appetite
The impacts of China's affluence are being felt downstream as well, in the form of greenhouse gases emissions.
CO2 emissions from China are increasing faster than from any other country in the world.
In 1990, it already accounted for some 10.5% of the world's CO2 emissions. Now, according to some analyses, China has become the world's largest emitter of climate-altering gases.
The backlash has been predictable. China's exemption from caps on greenhouse gas emissions was one of the major reasons why the US Senate unanimously rejected the Kyoto Protocol in 1997.
It was a powerful justification for the Bush administration's stance on Kyoto.
The politicians believed that US efforts would be pointless if China's emissions continued to grow.
But are the criticisms entirely fair? First, markets and emissions must be considered relative to China's enormous population and fairly recent emergence as a newly industrialised nation.
China's population of 1.3 billion is about four times larger than that of the US, but each Chinese citizen uses about 25% of the energy consumed by his or her US counterpart.
Even that measure is skewed, because much of that energy used in China is to manufacture goods that are then purchased by Americans, Europeans and Japanese.
The current rates of emissions also hide the fact that the industrialised western nations (including Japan) have been belching out CO2 far longer than China, which only reached newly industrialised status in the 1990s.
Exotic tastes
China certainly deserves criticism for its impacts on other areas of the environment.
Chinese consumers have a large and growing appetite for exotic medicines that has directly led to dozens of species in China and throughout the world becoming endangered.
Its citizens are still responsible for consumption of staggering amounts of wildlife and threatened timber products, some illegally smuggled from as far away as Indonesia and Zimbabwe.
In 2008, several US states moved to ban turtle trapping on public lands, and 12 more US turtle species have been proposed for the endangered species list - all because of the impact of trade to China.
But even with regard to trade in wildlife, the story is hardly as simple as it is often portrayed.
China signed the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) and put it into force in 1981, passing legislation soon after to back up the treaty.
In many areas, the government has made dramatic strides in controlling wildlife trade over the past 20 years, even as demand has sky-rocketed due to consumers' new affluence.
Illegal wildlife products have largely disappeared from shops and markets in much of China, as enforcement of wildlife laws has become clearer and more effective.
Gone are the days when tiger bone wine could be openly advertised, and monkeys and wild caught parrots were openly sold in markets.
The tiger brand plasters found in every Chinese pharmacy contain no tiger, and the tiger and leopard skins sold to foolish westerners at many tourist traps are actually just poorly dyed dog skins.
Chinese consumers seeking to stock up on threatened wildlife must now travel to neighbouring countries, where unscrupulous local dealers still feel safe offering them a multitude of products, both fake and real.
China has also made dramatic strides in protecting the best examples of natural habitats in nature reserves and other protected areas.
More than 15% of the nation's land area is legally protected in thousands of nature reserves and national parks, and most national reserves now have full-time staff that carry out regular patrols.
The proposal and approval of the enormous Giant Panda Sanctuary World Heritage Natural Site in the Sichuan Qionglai Mountains is just one of the most recent examples of China's political will and dedication to protecting world natural heritage.
This is essential, since the rapid pace of development means that natural ecosystems outside protected areas are under increasing threat from the relentless search for more land and resources.
Controlling the breakneck development has proved to be difficult or impossible for many regions, but a new law on Environmental Impact Assessments, which became effective in September 2003, has been praised as a model of good legislation.
It includes provisions to increase protection for critical habitats and protected areas. There is still a major gap between policy and implementation, but it may not be long before the "Three Simultaneous Commencements" (the start of permit application, the start of the environmental impact assessment and the start of digging) becomes a thing of the past, at least in the country's more progressive regions.
Team effort
China has made impressive efforts to rise to standards set by the international community, but the efforts have not always been good enough to stem the tide in the face of massive and growing pressures.
It can be argued that none of this will mean much if China's greenhouse gas emissions cause climate disasters to habitats and species throughout the world.
But here too, China has responded to global needs.
It signed the Kyoto Protocol of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1998 and ratified the Protocol in 2002, something that the US failed to do.
More importantly, it made emissions reduction a national policy in 2005, when the nation's 11th Five-Year Plan (for 2006 to 2010) set a target of reducing energy consumption per unit of GDP by 20%.
The EU gave itself a similar target, but has until 2020 to achieve it; US plans are less ambitious still.
Given the pattern of exaggeration and over-statement often seen in the international press, it is little wonder that strident international criticism just seems to be dismissed as sour grapes by most people in China.
Is it time, as many Chinese critics argue, for westerners to back off and tend to their own houses?
Perhaps. But isn't it the responsibility of all, both producer nations and consumer nations, to work together to solve problems such as depletion of ocean fisheries and over-exploitation of threatened species?
We might hope that at least global climate change is so much of a clear and present danger that, for once, countries could put aside their differences and act together to find a workable solution, perhaps based on the seemingly fair standard of a "climate change allocation" for each person on the planet.
China should respond to critics by providing clear answers detailing what is being done to solve real problems. And that is not "China-bashing"; the same could be said of every fully industrialised nation.
Global problems demand global accountability; and that creates a responsibility of each of us to point out when policy and implementation are failing, and to help each nation rise to the needs.
Dr William Bleisch is science director of the China Exploration & Research Society
The Green Room is a series of opinion articles on environmental topics running weekly on the BBC News website
Story from BBC NEWS
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/science/nature/8100988.st
Published: 2009/06/16 08:46:32 GMT
© BBC MMIX
5.28.2009
lemons.
4.17.2009
sigh.
It's made all over the place! The parts came from China, Philippines, and one other place. But it was assembled together in China.
My first China made purchase of the year.
4.14.2009
a craving not satisfied.

4.04.2009
A Green China?
BBC Brasil, Beijing
China's unprecedented economic growth over the past 30 years has come at a huge cost to the environment.
The damage has not only been to the air the Chinese breath or the water in their rivers, but also to its reputation across the world.
But there are signs that China may now be serious about tackling pollution to prove to the world that it can develop while causing less damage to the environment.
BBC Brasil travelled to China, which recently overtook the United States as the world's biggest emitter of carbon dioxide, as part of its series looking at where the BRIC economies - Brazil, Russia, India and China - will be in 2020.
China is today the world's biggest consumer of coal, the cheapest yet most polluting source of energy.
The country uses a quarter of the world's coal reserves and depends on it to provide more than two thirds of its energy needs.
The rapid growth has also altered old Chinese habits that used to be environmentally friendly.
As soon as you walk out from your hotel onto the street of Beijing you realise that the typical image of Chinese city streets being packed with bicycle-riding commuters is becoming a thing of the past.
Bumper to bumper, the people of Beijing crawl to work in their cars. Each car belching out fumes into the atmosphere.
In Beijing alone, the number of cars has tripled over the past decade, with more than 1,000 new vehicles arriving on the streets of the capital every day.
In discussions for the post-Kyoto global climate treaty, China now accepts the need for mandatory targets to reduce greenhouse gasses, but with the condition that stricter rules should be applied to developed countries.
"China is no longer a closed country," says Tom Wang, spokesman for Greenpeace in Beijing.
"To keep its economic growth and its place as an important player on the international scene, it needs to acknowledge what other countries are saying about it."
According to Mr Want, environmental damage costs the country up to 5% of its economic output each year.
Chinese victims
The biggest victims of the pollution are the Chinese themselves.
Beijing resident
One woman in Beijing complained about the low cloud that floats above the city centre.
A man complained about a "constant inexplicable cough".
According to the World Bank, of the 30 most polluted cities in the world, 20 are in China.
Each year more than 400,000 people die of pollution-related illnesses.
But when BBC Brasil visited Wang Xiaoming of Beijing's Environmental Protection Bureau, the mood was upbeat.
To get to the main office you walk over a glass floor under which is a model of the city showing where its monitoring points are.
Mr Wang's office is full of computer screens being studied by technicians.
He points proudly at one of the screens, which shows that pollution in the city is better than the level considered to be safe by the World Health Organisation.
And that's not all. Mr Wang says the trend for pollution has been down in the city for some time.
According to Mr Wang, last year Beijing had 274 of what are called "blue sky days", which is when the pollution level is under the maximum level considered acceptable by the WHO. In 2007, they had 246 days of blue sky days while in 1998 they only had 100.
Acid rain
But it is not only air quality that is a matter of concern.
Many of the country's rivers are polluted with heavy metals, spoiling the water used for irrigation and contaminating the food chain.
Around a third of the Chinese territory is affected by the acid rain caused by pollution. The rain has a direct impact on the country's food production.
The Chinese government has started to act on these issues, mainly because environmental damage poses a threat to the economic growth of the country.
Last year the Beijing Olympics served as a platform for the Chinese government to show the world that it cares about the environment.
All of the buildings designed for the Games had 'green' features such as solar power and systems for collecting rain water.
In addition, restrictions were set to limit emissions from polluting industries, and a rota-based system was put in place to reduce by half the amount of cars on the streets of Beijing.
These measures achieved what had seemed impossible: blue skies during the two weeks of the Games.
The measures adopted during the Olympics, although limited in their reach, proved the country is capable of fighting against its environmental problems if there is political will.
David Dollar
For David Dollar, director of the World Bank in China, the country has achieved some progress in this area, although it still faces serious problems.
"If we had had this conversation a year ago, I would have said that environmental issues were the greatest challenge faced by China and the biggest threat to the country's growth in the long term," says Dollar.
"However, what is little known is that there has been a great deal of progress on the environmental front in the last ten years. China is one of a few countries in the world that have been rapidly increasing their forest cover. It is managing to reduce air and water pollution," says Dollar.
If China can develop alternative energy sources and reduce emissions, the country might in 2020 be an example of how economic development and environmental protection can work together.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/business/7972125.stm
Published: 2009/04/02 22:33:21 GMT
© BBC MMIX
4.02.2009
gummy bears
3.24.2009
more on lightbulbs.
3.09.2009
3.03.2009
necessities.
2.25.2009
hmm...
A year without meat on the other hand is a little more challenging. Not that I was a meat lover to begin with, but a whiff of a hamburger or a glimpse of steak gets me salivating.
BUT, I am loving all the non meat dishes that I do eat : )
Portabella Mushroom sandwiches are delicious. Grilled veggie sandwiches or paninis are excellent. The only taste I can't get used to? Boca patties. Bleh.
I'm giving up one more thing until Easter...CHOCOLATE. Good bye chocolate.
2.19.2009
I was cleaning out one of the rooms in my house and decided it's finally time to get rid of the clothes I will never wear because 1. I don't fit into them, 2. I don't know what I was thinking back then when I actually wore some of the clothes around, 3. I have to let go... I looked up online "How to donate clothes" and came across this article about how even though we donate clothes, most of it probably won't even be opened up, but just automatically shipped over to a 3rd world country.
That's great, right?
But is it great when clothing manufacturers within that country have to shut down. Is it great when the people begin selling these free clothes to their neighbors? Is it great knowing that your old t-shirt, one you would never wear again or let anyone you know, wear the t-shirt, is worn by a little boy in Africa? Yes, it is great that we can give them at least something to wear, but it takes away from helping a country rebuild its own economy and to rely on the work that they themselves can produce.
I was really convicted by reading this.
2.13.2009
fail #2
Atleast I have not eaten any meat products yet.
2.12.2009
Shoes
***Ok, I have to put a bit of a plug in to what I learned during the trial I was a juror for. DO NOT go into a business with a friend WITHOUT a WRITTEN contract. Actually, I would say avoid going into a business with a friend, period. Also, please keep a good record of your money if you do decide to go into a business. It saves people (jurors!) a lot of time in case you need to take your records to court.***
Back to shoes....
It is very difficult for me to find shoes because of my wide feet, so usually, if a shoe fits, I buy a pair because who knows when I will be able to find another black heel that fits.
Aldo, another shoe store, had shoes made all from China. Macy's shoe department was made up of China made shoes.
Now, the tricky thing is that some of the shoes do not have a mark, or it is very difficult to find the "Made in..." stamp. I had to search through the entire shoe, the shoe box, and the other shoes made from the same company to determine whether or not a shoe was made in China. Designer shoes, no brand shoes, mediocre brands...does not matter. All were made in China.
Looks like I'll be wearing my Chucks till next year.
2.02.2009
another thing...
In order to kick off my year without meat, my mom made Kalbi Jjim, my favorite Korean red meat dish, as my one last meat dish (I'm drooling just a little thinking about it). I have not given in yet, but I have been having some "guilty" dreams. One of my dreams a few weeks back made me laugh when I woke up. I was out at a restaurant looking at the menu. I told the waiter I could not eat chicken, but the next thing I knew, I was cutting into a piece of chicken, eating it up, and then yelling that I wasn't supposed to be eating it! Ok, it was much more interesting in my dream...
Last week though, I had a dream about a Chili Dog. One of my guilty pleasure foods has always been hot dogs. I know, sausages are pretty gross, but I can't help but liking them. I can say that I prefer hot dogs over hamburgers. The Chili Dog looked amazing and I took a nice big bite out of it... yummy.
Have I been tempted to eat meat? OF COURSE! Good think I love fish over meat...but when you know you can't have something, it makes you desire it more. In my case... Chinese goods and Meat are calling my name.
1.29.2009
!!! (thanks Sarah)
'Made in China'? Not at Capitol Visitors Center
- House committee bars sale of $100,000 in souvenirs because of their origin
- Dozens of U.S. companies want to make items instead, lawmaker says
- He says visitors center should send items back to China
CNN Radio
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Washington souvenirs worth $100,000 -- including images of the Capitol dome and printings of the U.S. Constitution -- are locked in storage, blocked from sale in the new U.S. Capitol Visitors Center because the items are made in China.
Rep. Bob Brady, D-Pennsylvania, chairman of the House Administration Committee, said he warned operators of the visitors center not to purchase merchandise made outside the United States, but they did it anyway.
Although the center has the goods in hand, Brady said, "I'm not allowing them to sell those products."
His Administration Committee oversees operations in the House of Representatives, including the House restaurant, parking facilities and the Capitol Visitors Center. A spokesman for the committee said other House gift shops also are under restrictions on items made outside the United States.
Brady, whose district includes Philadelphia, insists that it's wrong for tourists to return home with a souvenir from the nation's capital that bears a "'Made in China' sticker."
"We can certainly find people that can make souvenirs of the nation's capital in America," Brady said.
In the past 10 days, he said, up to 40 U.S. companies have contacted his office, eager to provide Capitol souvenirs and trinkets.
As for the items the Capitol Visitors Center operators got from China, Brady said, "they made the mistake; they can send them back."
He concedes that the visitors center may have to pay shipping costs to return the goods but said, "if we have to lose a little bit, we'll lose a little bit."
1.27.2009
label- less products and such
I bought Mead "Press-it Seal-it" envelopes and since I was already at the cash register, I could only give the box a quick turn before handing it over. It was label-less. If OfficeMax name tags were made in China, these envelopes could just as easily been made in China. I will have to ignore the fact that there is no label... for now.
on another note...
I know it has only been 27 days, but I have become very aware of where my money goes (mostly on eating out or buying food). I no longer take random strolls through the mall, knowing that I will have longing for things just because I can't have them. (Yes, sometimes I just went to the mall or walked along streets with shops to get out of the house). Good thing I have no money to spend either : P
1.23.2009
a thought.
I've been poking around General Miscellany for a few minutes when a Chinese ceramic Jesus stops me cold...I pick him up, confirm that he is indeed from China, and then hover in the aisle and study him...He looks melancholy, and he makes me feel the same. What I'd like to know is whether anybody bothers to explain who this guy is to the Chinese workers who crafted him. It seems only fair that if you are going to ask somebody to spend 14 hours a day painting Jesus figurines then you might mention the big picture to them, perhaps tell them his name, and even point out that he cuts quite a figure in religious circles around the globe...we've got Jesus, famous defender of the poor, molded and painted by poor Chinese workers on the other side of the world...he generates sales for the richest retailer in the world.How ironic the whole picture is. Unless the company that manufactures the ceramic Jesus is a Christian company in China to utilize business as a means for evangelism (which I doubt), there is something very wrong here. However, I cannot judge the company since 1. I don't know who manufactured the ceramic, 2. I don't know how much the workers are being paid, and 3. I don't know the conditions under which they are working. I can only conclude through my limited research and what the media has said that most workers in China are underpaid and are working in terrible conditions.
What struck me about the paragraph was the sentence "What I'd like to know is whether anybody bothers to explain who this guy is to the Chinese workers..." Do they even wonder? Are they curious at all? And, what do the products they are producing for Americans say about Americans? Why would Americans want a ceramic of a white man with long hair dressed in sandals and what can only look like a long night gown? What is the purpose for this figurine?
If anything, my voluntary sacrifice of goods made in China would be to protest against the companies that take advantage of the workers and to stop buying into the consumerism mindset. Honestly, my research into the conditions of the workers has not been thorough and I have barely scratched the surface on this. I know that I am barely making a dent in the economy and one single person not participating in the purchasing of China made goods is hardly noticed in America. My challenge to you few readers? Try going one month without buying a single item marked with the words "Made in China."
(I apologize if my thoughts seem scattered and lacks any sense.)
